Menu

Ireland's sailing, boating & maritime magazine

Displaying items by tag: Beneteau First 36

At BJ Marine, we have been incredibly excited about the re-emergence of the First range and what it could mean for offshore racing, round the cans racing and fast performance cruising in Ireland and the Irish Sea. After a couple of seasons without boat shows, we debuted the First 36 in Dusseldorf in January 2023, and the first boats were handed over in spring 2023. We were particularly proud to have sold hull #9 to Stevie Goddard at our Pwllheli office. Such is the importance of this new model for Beneteau that Andraz Mihelin, the main man for all Beneteau First models below 40ft, was onboard for the Fastnet race and James Kirwan, BJ Marine Group Manager, took the opportunity to catch up with him now that the dust has settled after the race.

The new Beneteau First 36(Above and below) The new Beneteau First 36

The new Beneteau First 36

James Kirwan: We have been really excited about the new Beneteau First 36 since it was announced at our Beneteau dealer conference as we instantly felt it was a great fit for Ireland and the Irish Sea. For those who aren’t familiar with the model, can you us give a brief overview of what you wanted the First 36 to deliver and how it is fundamentally different to the previous generations of successful First’s such as the First 40, 40.7, 34.7, 36.7, 35 etc?

Andraz Mihelin: Basically, we first had to admit that with .7 series and its evolution in 35/40 we had pretty big shoes to fill. Also, we noticed that the sailors became more demanding on the performance sailing boat should achive as well as on the comfort she should offer. It was clear we have our job cut out for us. So essentially what we aimed for is a boat that at 36ft offers interior of an old First 40 while reducing the displacement by almost 3 tones. By avoiding exotic materials like Carbon or Epoxy we managed to achive that without pushing the price of the boat in niche racer market. After this year's Fastnet we can say that she works as advertised – upwind in a breeze she can keep up with the First 40s but she is radically faster and more fun in reaching and downwind.

JK: BJ Marine sold Faenol, hull #9, and the boat was delivered to our Pwllheli office for commissioning. The Fastnet Race was the big target for this season and it represented the first true IRC test for the model anywhere in the world. Can you tell us who was onboard for the race and how you felt as a crew in the 24 hours before the race with the forecast as it was?

AM: I was excited about the forecast. As I said she is a production boat displacing only 4.8 tonnes with all the wood, Corian tops and inner liners, so having a proper real-life test in an iconic race as Fastnet was the best we could hope for. Especially since we had the designer – Sam Manuard joining the team as well as super experienced Jochem Visser. Altogether we were eight – Apart from Steven Goddard and his friend James Dean and the guys I mentioned, there was also world-class meteo guru Jure Jerman, Norwegian journalist and sailor Oyvind Bordhal, First 27SE owner Milan Tomek and myself. In essence a lot of afterguards but not so many skilled bowmen. We never really sailed together but the chemistry was great and I think I can say for all of us we had a great time despite the testing conditions.

JK: From the start to the Fastnet Rock, you seemed to have every condition imaginable; what did you learn about the boat, and yourselves, in that section of the race?

AM: Basically it was all upwind from 40+ knots after the start to super light just before the Fastnet. Interestingly enough she proved to be very well behaved and fast upwind in the 20+ knots true wind. Even though we were missing a J4 jib we could pretty much keep up with First 40s and other race boats of our size. What became clear is we need a bit more rake on the rig while the rest seems pretty much as it should be.

JK: Once around the rock, the First 36 really seemed to take off. What numbers were you seeing and how did the boat feel?

AM: First part to the Scillies was a close reach about halfway under code 0 and the rest under J1. There were no real overtaking opportunities there since we were all pretty much on displacement speeds.

It was really only the last 160M where we could ease the sheets and show what she could do. We covered this distance in about 15 hours averaging 13-14kt for longer periods of time and peaking over 20kt when we caught a good wave. Also worth mentioning is that we really only had an A2 spinnaker so after the wind started to get over 30 knots, we had to change down to the jib. Plenty of potential still with some A5 kite and jib-top reacher. That part was absolutely amazing. All the time, under full control and cheering like little kids, every time we exceeded 20kt of boatspeed.

JK: Looking back now having recovered, what are your thoughts on the overall performance of the boat under IRC in the race? Are there performance gains there that we can look to optimise for future races and to help future owners?

AM: Absolutely! 14th in IRC1 was as good as we could hope for a boat that was pretty much out of the box. With 2-3 extra sails, improvement in rig and rudder trim and more training, there are still hours to be gained in a race like this year's Fastnet. Also the conditions where ¾ of the race was upwind or close reach were not ideal for a boat like 36. So essentially, Fastnet was the first big entry in our knowledge base on how to race 36 in IRC so with more owners starting to race we are excited to collect and share more insights on how to sail and tweak her in order to get even better.

JK: To finish, what was the big highlight from this race for you personally?

AM: A surf where the boat speed went 20, 20.5, 22,... 10, 9.5, which meant the whole bow all the way to the paddle wheel was out of the water like we are used to see on offshore racers. I would pay good money to have a drone shot of that. 

For full details on the Beneteau First 36 and the entire Beneteau range, please contact BJ Marine at [email protected] or call the Greystones head office on 01 287 8334

Published in BJ Marine

Ireland's Offshore Renewable Energy

Because of Ireland's location at the Atlantic edge of the EU, it has more offshore energy potential than most other countries in Europe. The conditions are suitable for the development of the full range of current offshore renewable energy technologies.

Offshore Renewable Energy FAQs

Offshore renewable energy draws on the natural energy provided by wind, wave and tide to convert it into electricity for industry and domestic consumption.

Offshore wind is the most advanced technology, using fixed wind turbines in coastal areas, while floating wind is a developing technology more suited to deeper water. In 2018, offshore wind provided a tiny fraction of global electricity supply, but it is set to expand strongly in the coming decades into a USD 1 trillion business, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). It says that turbines are growing in size and in power capacity, which in turn is "delivering major performance and cost improvements for offshore wind farms".

The global offshore wind market grew nearly 30% per year between 2010 and 2018, according to the IEA, due to rapid technology improvements, It calculated that about 150 new offshore wind projects are in active development around the world. Europe in particular has fostered the technology's development, led by Britain, Germany and Denmark, but China added more capacity than any other country in 2018.

A report for the Irish Wind Energy Assocation (IWEA) by the Carbon Trust – a British government-backed limited company established to accelerate Britain's move to a low carbon economy - says there are currently 14 fixed-bottom wind energy projects, four floating wind projects and one project that has yet to choose a technology at some stage of development in Irish waters. Some of these projects are aiming to build before 2030 to contribute to the 5GW target set by the Irish government, and others are expected to build after 2030. These projects have to secure planning permission, obtain a grid connection and also be successful in a competitive auction in the Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS).

The electricity generated by each turbine is collected by an offshore electricity substation located within the wind farm. Seabed cables connect the offshore substation to an onshore substation on the coast. These cables transport the electricity to land from where it will be used to power homes, farms and businesses around Ireland. The offshore developer works with EirGrid, which operates the national grid, to identify how best to do this and where exactly on the grid the project should connect.

The new Marine Planning and Development Management Bill will create a new streamlined system for planning permission for activity or infrastructure in Irish waters or on the seabed, including offshore wind farms. It is due to be published before the end of 2020 and enacted in 2021.

There are a number of companies aiming to develop offshore wind energy off the Irish coast and some of the larger ones would be ESB, SSE Renewables, Energia, Statkraft and RWE.

There are a number of companies aiming to develop offshore wind energy off the Irish coast and some of the larger ones would be ESB, SSE Renewables, Energia, Statkraft and RWE. Is there scope for community involvement in offshore wind? The IWEA says that from the early stages of a project, the wind farm developer "should be engaging with the local community to inform them about the project, answer their questions and listen to their concerns". It says this provides the community with "the opportunity to work with the developer to help shape the final layout and design of the project". Listening to fishing industry concerns, and how fishermen may be affected by survey works, construction and eventual operation of a project is "of particular concern to developers", the IWEA says. It says there will also be a community benefit fund put in place for each project. It says the final details of this will be addressed in the design of the RESS (see below) for offshore wind but it has the potential to be "tens of millions of euro over the 15 years of the RESS contract". The Government is also considering the possibility that communities will be enabled to invest in offshore wind farms though there is "no clarity yet on how this would work", the IWEA says.

Based on current plans, it would amount to around 12 GW of offshore wind energy. However, the IWEA points out that is unlikely that all of the projects planned will be completed. The industry says there is even more significant potential for floating offshore wind off Ireland's west coast and the Programme for Government contains a commitment to develop a long-term plan for at least 30 GW of floating offshore wind in our deeper waters.

There are many different models of turbines. The larger a turbine, the more efficient it is in producing electricity at a good price. In choosing a turbine model the developer will be conscious of this ,but also has to be aware the impact of the turbine on the environment, marine life, biodiversity and visual impact. As a broad rule an offshore wind turbine will have a tip-height of between 165m and 215m tall. However, turbine technology is evolving at a rapid rate with larger more efficient turbines anticipated on the market in the coming years.

 

The Renewable Electricity Support Scheme is designed to support the development of renewable energy projects in Ireland. Under the scheme wind farms and solar farms compete against each other in an auction with the projects which offer power at the lowest price awarded contracts. These contracts provide them with a guaranteed price for their power for 15 years. If they obtain a better price for their electricity on the wholesale market they must return the difference to the consumer.

Yes. The first auction for offshore renewable energy projects is expected to take place in late 2021.

Cost is one difference, and technology is another. Floating wind farm technology is relatively new, but allows use of deeper water. Ireland's 50-metre contour line is the limit for traditional bottom-fixed wind farms, and it is also very close to population centres, which makes visibility of large turbines an issue - hence the attraction of floating structures Do offshore wind farms pose a navigational hazard to shipping? Inshore fishermen do have valid concerns. One of the first steps in identifying a site as a potential location for an offshore wind farm is to identify and assess the level of existing marine activity in the area and this particularly includes shipping. The National Marine Planning Framework aims to create, for the first time, a plan to balance the various kinds of offshore activity with the protection of the Irish marine environment. This is expected to be published before the end of 2020, and will set out clearly where is suitable for offshore renewable energy development and where it is not - due, for example, to shipping movements and safe navigation.

YEnvironmental organisations are concerned about the impact of turbines on bird populations, particularly migrating birds. A Danish scientific study published in 2019 found evidence that larger birds were tending to avoid turbine blades, but said it didn't have sufficient evidence for smaller birds – and cautioned that the cumulative effect of farms could still have an impact on bird movements. A full environmental impact assessment has to be carried out before a developer can apply for planning permission to develop an offshore wind farm. This would include desk-based studies as well as extensive surveys of the population and movements of birds and marine mammals, as well as fish and seabed habitats. If a potential environmental impact is identified the developer must, as part of the planning application, show how the project will be designed in such a way as to avoid the impact or to mitigate against it.

A typical 500 MW offshore wind farm would require an operations and maintenance base which would be on the nearby coast. Such a project would generally create between 80-100 fulltime jobs, according to the IWEA. There would also be a substantial increase to in-direct employment and associated socio-economic benefit to the surrounding area where the operation and maintenance hub is located.

The recent Carbon Trust report for the IWEA, entitled Harnessing our potential, identified significant skills shortages for offshore wind in Ireland across the areas of engineering financial services and logistics. The IWEA says that as Ireland is a relatively new entrant to the offshore wind market, there are "opportunities to develop and implement strategies to address the skills shortages for delivering offshore wind and for Ireland to be a net exporter of human capital and skills to the highly competitive global offshore wind supply chain". Offshore wind requires a diverse workforce with jobs in both transferable (for example from the oil and gas sector) and specialist disciplines across apprenticeships and higher education. IWEA have a training network called the Green Tech Skillnet that facilitates training and networking opportunities in the renewable energy sector.

It is expected that developing the 3.5 GW of offshore wind energy identified in the Government's Climate Action Plan would create around 2,500 jobs in construction and development and around 700 permanent operations and maintenance jobs. The Programme for Government published in 2020 has an enhanced target of 5 GW of offshore wind which would create even more employment. The industry says that in the initial stages, the development of offshore wind energy would create employment in conducting environmental surveys, community engagement and development applications for planning. As a site moves to construction, people with backgrounds in various types of engineering, marine construction and marine transport would be recruited. Once the site is up and running , a project requires a team of turbine technicians, engineers and administrators to ensure the wind farm is fully and properly maintained, as well as crew for the crew transfer vessels transporting workers from shore to the turbines.

The IEA says that today's offshore wind market "doesn't even come close to tapping the full potential – with high-quality resources available in most major markets". It estimates that offshore wind has the potential to generate more than 420 000 Terawatt hours per year (TWh/yr) worldwide – as in more than 18 times the current global electricity demand. One Terawatt is 114 megawatts, and to put it in context, Scotland it has a population a little over 5 million and requires 25 TWh/yr of electrical energy.

Not as advanced as wind, with anchoring a big challenge – given that the most effective wave energy has to be in the most energetic locations, such as the Irish west coast. Britain, Ireland and Portugal are regarded as most advanced in developing wave energy technology. The prize is significant, the industry says, as there are forecasts that varying between 4000TWh/yr to 29500TWh/yr. Europe consumes around 3000TWh/year.

The industry has two main umbrella organisations – the Irish Wind Energy Association, which represents both onshore and offshore wind, and the Marine Renewables Industry Association, which focuses on all types of renewable in the marine environment.

©Afloat 2020